Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0355019940330010037
Korean Nurse
1994 Volume.33 No. 1 p.37 ~ p.51
The Effect of Cutaneus Stimulation on AV Fistula Puncture pain of Hemodialysis Patients


Abstract
The cutaneous stimulation is an independent nursing intervention used in various painful conditions, and is explained by gate contrcl thccry.
This study was aimed at identifying the effect of cutaneous stimulation on reduction of arteriovenous fistula puncture pain of hemodialysis patients.
One group repeated measurement post test research was designed. Forty-five hemodialysis patients who received arteriovenous fistula puncture regulary in hemodialysis units of an attacted D hospital to K university have been studied from August 16
to 21,
1993. First the arteriovenous fistula puncture pain of control period was measured, and then the arteriovenous fistula puncture pain of experimental period(with cutaneous stimulation) was measured.
The instrument used for this study were visual analogue pain scale as subjective pain measurement, objective pain behavior checklist and Spielberger's Trait Anxiety Inventory as intervening varidables.
Analysis of data was dine by use of paired t-test, t-test, ANOVA and Perarson correlation coefficient.
The results of this study were summarized as follows;
1) The first hypothesis that the subjective pain score of arteriovenous fistula puncture pain in experimental period(with cutaneous stimulation) will be lower than in control period was partly supported. The subjective pain score of arterial
line
was
rejected(paired t=-0.28, p=0.77) and the subjective pain score fo venous line was supported(paired t=2.61, p=0.01)
2) The second hypothesis that the objective pain behavior score of arteriovenous fistula pain in experimental period(with cutaneous stimulation) will be lower than in control period was rejected(arterial line paired t=-0.45, P=0.65; venous line
paired
t=-0.36, P=0.72).
3) The third hypothesis that the cardiopulmonary signs of arteriovenous fistula puncture pain in experimental period(with cutaneous stimulation) will be lower than in control period was rejected(pulse Paired t=-0.8, P=0.42; systoloic BP paired
t=-0.98,
p=0.33; diastolic BP paired t=0.43, P=0.66).
Further experimental studies with simple intravenous injection patients will be recommended in orde4r to identify the effect of cutaneous stimulation.
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information